1 min read
Sources:
Kevin's account
["default","default"]
Short answer
He is not bullish on gold. When his channel covers a gold bull calling for $10,000 an ounce and an 80% market collapse, that is an editorial on someone else’s view, and the title reflects that view, not his. His own position is to buy dips in productive assets and real estate. He expects a future crash to be met with lower rates rather than gold-friendly money printing, though he calls that an opinion. 1
Stance: Not bullish (on gold)
Confusion: Editorial titles (covering gold bulls is not endorsing them)
His view
Kevin’s account
I am not bullish on gold. In one video I might editorialize on a gold bull who thinks gold is going to $10,000 and the market will collapse 80%. In the very next video I share my own view: people should buy the dip, fears are overblown, and I am not bullish on gold. People associate the titles with my opinion when the videos are editorials on what other people are talking about. 1
Why
His stated framework is that the next downturn is more likely to bring lower yields than a money-printing response, and that productive assets bought cheaply, especially real estate with no debt, do better across that than a metal. That is his opinion, offered on the crash page. Neither Kevin personally, by his account, nor Reinvest, by its filings, holds gold as a position.
Not a gold bull. The scary gold titles are reports on other people. 1
Simply put
✅ His view
➡️ He does not recommend gold.
✅ Why people think otherwise
➡️ He makes videos about gold bulls. The title matches their view, not his.
Sources
Kevin's account, Clickbait and flip-flopping: “In one video I might editorialize on a gold bull who thinks gold is going to $10,000 ... in the very next video I share my own view that people should buy the dip, fears are overblown, and I'm not bullish on gold.” Read the excerpt
