Home
Allegations, answered
2 min read
Sources:
press and public records, Kevin's account, his own videos
["default","default","default"]
Short answer
The phrase comes from a November 2019 Curbed profile that called some of Kevin’s landlord-tenant views “arguably incendiary,” citing his 700-plus credit score requirement and his advice that owners not tell tenants they own the property. Kevin does not dispute the label and says his tenant criteria have not changed. He opposes eviction moratoria. He no longer owns rental property personally; the rentals sit inside House Hack, which he controls. 123
Origin: Curbed, 2019 (profile by Steven T. Wright, November 15, 2019)
Credit score rule: 700+ (still his stated criterion)
Personal rentals today: None (rentals are held by House Hack, Inc.)
The record
On November 15, 2019, Curbed published a profile of “landlord influencers,” YouTubers teaching viewers to buy and manage rentals. It described some of Kevin’s opinions on landlord-tenant relations as arguably incendiary, giving two examples: requiring applicants to have a credit score of 700 or higher, and advising owners to conceal from tenants that they own the property. The label was quoted again during the 2021 governor campaign and appears in his Wikipedia entry. During the pandemic he also drew criticism from tenant advocates for opposing eviction moratoria. 1
Kevin’s account
Kevin’s account
I do not dispute the label. It was not flattering during the governor campaign, but it is totally applicable. It was then and it is now. I still believe in the same tenant criteria Curbed quoted. Nothing has changed there. On eviction moratoria: I still think they are a bad idea. If you do not pay rent, you should leave. 2
Kevin’s account
I no longer own any rental properties personally. I own 100% of the controlling interest in House Hack, which is the only place rental properties are. I do not compete with my own company. 3
What that means for members and investors
The screening standards Kevin teaches are the ones the company uses. Reinvest’s in-house property management, run by Lauren Paffrath, applies them to the 63 apartments and 32 houses the company owned at June 2026. Investors should read that as a policy choice: stricter screening, lower delinquency risk, and a public stance on evictions that some people find harsh.
On the question of self-dealing, his statement is that the company is the only place his rentals sit, so he is not buying deals for himself that the company could have had. The two property sales he made to the company, in 2024 and 2025, were each appraised above the price paid; that note is in the real estate section.
In his own videos
He accepts the label and stands by the screening rules. The one thing that changed is where the rentals live: inside the company, not his own name. 23
Simply put
✅ What the label means
➡️ A 2019 magazine article profiled YouTubers who teach people to be landlords and called Kevin's views harsh.
➡️ The examples: require a 700 credit score, and do not tell tenants you own the building.
✅ What Kevin says
➡️ The label fits, then and now.
➡️ Same screening rules. If a tenant does not pay, they should leave, and eviction bans are a bad idea.
✅ What changed
➡️ He does not personally own rentals anymore. The company does, and he says he does not compete with it.
Sources
Wikipedia, Kevin Paffrath (Curbed 2019 profile, "arguably incendiary" views on landlord-tenant relations), Open
Kevin's account, Landlord influencer: “I don't dispute the label ... I still believe in the same tenant criteria Curbed quoted. Nothing has changed there.” Read the excerpt
Kevin's account, Personal holdings: “I no longer own any rental properties personally. I own 100% of the controlling interest in House Hack, which is the only place rental properties are. I don't compete with my own company.” Read the excerpt
Kevin on YouTube, "Millionaire Landlord Confronts Tenants Getting Evicted" (2019-11-27), at 0:00: “Millionaire Landlord Confronts Tenants Getting Evicted” Watch from 0:00
Kevin on YouTube, "Getting Sued by Tenants" (2019-10-07), at 0:00: “Getting Sued by Tenants” Watch from 0:00
